‘Unravel’ at the Barbican, London, UK : A textile artists’ exhibition

‘Unravel’ at the Barbican, London, UK : A textile artists’ exhibition

I have recently been to see the exhibition ‘Unravel. The Power and Politics of Textiles in Art’ at the Barbican Centre in London, UK. Here is the link to the relevant page of the Barbican website.

It runs until the 26th May 2024, so people living close can still catch it if they like. The theme is clearly about political art, or art that tackles difficult themes.

I have to say that it got mixed feelings from me, I liked some of the pieces and some not as much, but anyway I feel that it is good to see textiles under the spotlight again, and hopefully this will help with recognition of textile artists everywhere. It was crowded, so there seems to be a lot of interest from the art cliques.

The exhibition was boasting pieces from 50 different international artists, the great majority of them well established and renowned, some of them already passed away. I actually went to the exhibition hoping to see mainly contemporary scene artists, and I understood later that I had seen pieces from some of the people who brought textiles into the Fine Arts spectrum in the Fifties and Sixties!

Most of the artists were also eclectic artist that had started as, variously, traditional painters or ceramists or sculptors.

Some of the pieces were a bit more conceptual than I would have liked, resulting in not particularly interesting techniques but a lot of effort in reading the accompanying texts, and it got a bit too much by the end of the afternoon.

Four of Leonore Tawney's woven geometrical hangings at the Barbican Centre in London UK.
American Leonore Tawney’s hangings were among the first woven hangings to be presented as Art.

An example of big names’ artworks were Leonore Tawney’s hanging woven sculptures, that broke with the idea of tapestries as the only possible woven outcome: she was a pioneer of the fibre art movement in the United States in the Fifties. Her long life (she lived to 100!) was dedicated to art and her parabola followed somewhat that of the fibre art movement , with a period of recognition in the Fifties followed by fewer exhibitions and recognition after the Seventies. After her earlier experiments with the loom in the Fifites, she gradually abandoned the loom for freer hanging shapes, and finally a nascent type of installation art, driven by a sense of spirituality that was in her 1950s works as well.

Another renowned American fibre artist whose piece I saw at the exhibition is Sheila Hicks, who was present with one of her installations of her ‘bundles’: groups of objects made of colourful yarn and fibres tightly wrapped to resemble sticks and pebbles. She is one of the innovators of the Sixties and Seventies fibre movement, and went on creating different installation art and sculpture pieces. The idea of traditional practices and indigenous rituals plays a part in her installations.

I felt that the representation of artists was a bit scarce on the European and Australian side, whereas the other continents seemed well represented.

There was a British contribution with a quilt piece by Tracey Emin, completely leaning towards the spoken word. It got a lot of interest from the artsy crowd. She upcycled different fabrics to create it, among those a Union Jack and felt scraps from old blankets, and hand appliqued and hand stitched them to shape provocative sentences.

Stitched wall hanging by Tracey Emin, where a background with the United Kingdom flag is covered in provocative words and sentences.
Tracey Emin, ‘No chance (WHAT A YEAR), 1999.

A contribution from Poland was a beautiful quilt by Malgorzata Mirga-Tas depicting life as a Roma, and made by repurposing everyday fabrics. The scene of life in a Roma settlement is very lively and immediately relatable.

Colorful quilt by Malgorzata Mirga-Tas showing an everyday scene in a Roma people settlement.
Malgorzata Mirga-Tas , from the series ‘Out of Egypt’. 2021.

I was particularly pleased to see some relatively new face from Africa, such as Billie Zangewa from Malawi and later South Africa, that I did not know and now I looked up on internet and in my reference book on textile artists.

Billie Zangewa's artwork 'Midnight Aura', 2012. It's a tapestry of a woman with a yellow dress in front of an urban background.
Billie Zangewa’s artwork ‘Midnight Aura’, 2012. Hand-embroidered silk collage.

She calls her pieces ‘hand-embroidered silk collage’ and I would say that that name suits them best than the name that I have seen given them, ‘silk tapestries’ . She uses scraps of silk fabrics with strong visual impact.

There was a room all about artworks by South African Igshaan Adams: some works hanging in the middle of the room, almost inviting the viewer to go into their clouds (totally forbidden! all the toddlers were tempted, but the museum attendants were very strict), some from the walls, and a big painting-like piece occupying the whole of one wall by itself. All encrusted with beads and shells and small semi-precious stones, with twisted fabric scraps.

Part of the room with Igshaan Adams' s pieces .
A partial view of Igshaan Adams’ s pieces.

Instead, Tau Lewis is a Canadian artist who talks about her roots as descendant of the African diaspora: she often represents lost Middle Passage victims as fantastical sea creatures in her huge wall hangings.

Tau Lewis's artwork 'The Coral Reef Preservation Society', a huge wall hanging with a black and grey background and several sea creatures.
Tau Lewis’s artwork ‘The Coral Reef Preservation Society’, 2019.

There was a good representation of Asian artists, such as Cian Dayrit from Philippines with two big embroidered maps in the section about Borderlands, showing places where colonialism is still a very current issue.

Hand embroidered map of Peasant and Indigenous struggles in a valley in the Philippines
Cian Dayrit (and Henry Caceres), ‘Valley of Dispossession’, 2021. Objects and embroidery on fabric.

Zamthingla Ruivah’s woven piece is actually not one to be shown in a museum as wall hanging but a piece that is meant to be worn everyday as a symbol of protest for the injustice and violence suffered by a young girl in India: thousands of people in the young girl’s local area now weave and wear cloth in that pattern that has become a silent rallying cry for justice. A kind of everyday power of art when it comes in contact with textiles.

Brightly red woven cloth by Zamthingla Ruivah
Zamthingla Ruivah’s woven piece for protest.

Another big name of the fibre art scene was Indian artist Mrinalini Mukherjee, who was present with three pieces of her knotted sculptures resembling human figures. I quite liked her pieces, as I am quite fond of macrame artists, and her pieces seemed to me viscerally meaningful, like ancient goddess’ statues talking to me from the past.

Sculpture of a human shape by Mrinalini Mukherjee.
‘Vanshri’ by Mrinalini Mukherjee, knotted dyed hemp.

There were no felt pieces at all, a bit disappointing that, as I know quite a few felters that could have been spot on for the theme.

There was a big installation piece that was made with unspoon wool, described in the exhibition leaflet as ‘the product of making yarn but stopping after the carding process.’ It seemed like barely prefelted wool to me, but a bit more consistent than carded wool. There was sound as well, but it was hard to appreciate it in the crowded room where also one other installation piece with sound had the same issue. The artist, South American Cecilia Vicuna, makes pieces that are grounded in Chilean traditions.

A view from down up of 'Quipu Austral' by Cecilia Vicuna. Strips of yellow orange and brown unspoon wool hanging from the ceiling.
Cecilia Vicuna, ‘Quipu Austral’, 2012. a partial view.

At the end of the exhibition there were some scraps of things that were made using materials and techniques seen in the art pieces, so we could touch and feel the materials: it was a very nice, family friendly touch (pun intended).

I hope to have given you a taste of what was on show.

After the exhibition, I also got a book on textile artists and politics, although not the exhibition book: ‘Women’s Work. From feminine arts to feminist art.’ by Ferren Gipson. It’s a collection of biographies of a couple of pages each, with some photos of artworks for each artist: I think that it can be a good reference book to know who is who in the old guard of textile art, though there are some more contemporary faces. It’s a bit scarce on the techniques side, but anyway pretty interesting from a historical point of view.

 

12 thoughts on “‘Unravel’ at the Barbican, London, UK : A textile artists’ exhibition

  1. What an interesting exhibition Caterina. Thanks so much for sharing.
    We have something more in common, I would not be big into conceptual art – I dislike the notion of having to read reams about an art piece. Personal opinion here but if a piece needs a mini ‘thesis’ to justify it, then it is missing the point.
    Some of the pieces you have brought to us are stunning (and understand’able’ too). The quilt by Malgorzata Mirga-Tas is stunning as is the piece by Billie Zangewa. The tragic story behind Zamthingla Ruivah’s woven piece cuts right to the heart. This story has endured for 38 years and now appears to be woven into the people’s psyche.
    Can’t help but wonder how Cian Dayrit acquired his Irish name!
    Helene x

    1. Thanks, Helene.
      Unfortunately, some of the artists have withdrawn their artworks in protest against the Barbican Centre’s decision to cancel a talk relating to the Gaza situation, Cian Dayrit is among them, so those artworks are not available any more to view in this exhibition!

    2. It’s Caterina, not Anonymous, I tried to log in, but it seems that I have this issue from my laptop, it does not log in properly.

    3. that’s rather ironic on part of the Barbican, given the theme of the exhibition. Fair dues to the artists for taking the stance.

  2. Thanks for the exhibition review. It would be interesting to see but a bit far for me to go. I too think that excessive explanation is not my thing.

    1. Thank you, Ruth.
      Well, I guess that one can find loads of textile exhibitions right now in your Country: the scene seems pretty good for fibre art from what I could see of American artists in this exhibition and daily online posts on social medias. I bet that you can find some amazing stuff to see closer to you! Indeed, quite a few of the artists in this exhibition were American. (a bit of envy)
      Caterina

  3. Yep, I’m another one who doesn’t do conceptual or long “tomes” to explain the meaning/reason behind a piece of “art”.
    Thanks for the tour Caterina and the link o the Barbican.
    Ann

    1. My pleasure, Ann.
      I understand that some of the pieces needed a bit of explanation, for instance when repurposed fabrics from workers’ uniforms or soldiers’ uniforms and parachutes were used in the artwork, that was a detail that could not be apparent by the appearance of the artwork and needed to be explained to give more punch to the protest element of the piece: I am fine with that. What leaves me perplexed is when the piece itself is not expressing much, and knowing the fact that the fabrics come from this and that or that the technique is used in an unconventional way does not add anything to my enjoyment of the artwork, only to my knowledge.
      Caterina

  4. An interesting exhibition. It is odd that a show about political protest in textile art would shy away from politics and protest. I wonder why so many pieces were old. Most of the artists must have done more recent work. But what do I know, maybe installation artist are less prolific.

    1. Thanks, Ann.
      I think that their first purpose was to educate the public about what has been and is textile art, so that would explain their selecting various older artists and older artworks. In fact, some of the older pieces were not about anything controversial or political whatsoever, if you do not count the fact that they were fibre art and made by women as controversial per se. I guess the curators of the exhibition are still catching up with the idea that women can be artists and art can be made with anything?

  5. I kept coming across pieces that said the works were subversive. It seemed to me the political pieces were so in your face as to be less interesting than others. And there were other pieces which I suspected had been given explanations after they’d been made. Apart from these annoyances, I enjoyed the exhibition.

  6. Thanks for your thoughts, I see what you mean, and yes, some of the pieces were as you say. All in all, I also enjoyed it 🙂

Leave a Reply to Jenny ThornleyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Felting and Fiber Studio

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading